Twitter

https://twitter.com/stellasglobe

Thursday, June 01, 2017

Embarrassing, Unjust, Tyrannical: Women Climate Warriors on Trump Quitting Paris Agreement

The worst fear has just come true: US President Donald Trump has just announced that he will make US abandon the historic climate deal - the Paris Agreement - because 1) he thinks the agreement is bad for American economy and 2) It was something he had promised to do during his election campaign.
 

  
A snapshot of the infamous California drought that affected millions. Credit : LA Times

As expected, reactions are pouring out from all corners of the world. Here is a compilation of some of the world's most vocal Women climate leaders:

Lidy Nacpil, Asian Peoples Movement on Debt and Development
"... a U.S. pull-out reveals utter disregard for the fate of humanity in favor of continued hegemony of U.S. elites and big corporate interests. Not to mention a tyrannical refusal to accept scientific findings."

Sunita Narain, Centre for Science and Environment, India
Climate change is a global challenge. The US cannot continue to keep the world hostage. Pulling out of the Paris Agreement would mean that with 5 per cent of the world population, the US will continue to jeopardise the remaining 95 per cent. Countries need to hold the US accountable for decisions that have a global impact,” said Narain.

 Rachel Smolker, BiofuelWatch USA
 "I am ashamed ... hope our allies will let their voices be heard at U.S. embassies - to both isolate Donald Trump and his ilk - and apply pressure on the U.S. to step up and take responsibility for real and equitable solutions to the escalating climate catastrophe."


Angela Adrar, Climate Justice Alliance USA

"Trump's erroneous and embarrassing decision to withdraw the U.S. from the agreement - proves more than ever that communities on the frontlines of the climate crisis are the ones to lead us toward a renewable and regenerative future. "


Catherine Abreu, Executive Director, Climate Action Network Canada
“Trump may be ready to abandon the benefits associated with climate action, including improved air quality and human health, job creation in emerging industries, and international influence. Yet it is clear that American states, communities, and businesses are not willing to make the same sacrifice."

A woman and a child in the Philippines  stand in what was their home once - destroyed by Typhoon Haiyan  Credit: AFP-Getty


Winnie Byanyima, Executive Director, Oxfam International
 “The world’s biggest historic emitter walking away from its climate change commitments is gravely unjust, but we must respond by redoubling our efforts. Those on the frontlines of climate change demand nothing less.” 


Keya Chatterjee, Executive Director, US Climate Action Network

 “Trump has no mandate from the US public to weaken the Paris Agreement, and should not be making big decisions while under investigation.  This cowardly failure to lead will only make us stronger as a movement as we push harder for just and equitable climate action.”
 

Women in Honduras set up solar panels. Credit: UNDP

 


But even as they lash out At Trump's decision, some leaders are already looking at the Post US Paris Agreement as glass-half- full situation. Here are some examples:

Susann Scherbarth,  Friends of the Earth Europe
 “Trump has cast America adrift from the global community and the reality of climate change. This should be a trigger for increased action on climate in Europe, to end fossil fuel dependency by 2030.”

Jennifer Morgan, Greenpeace International Executive Director

“Almost 200 countries committed to climate action in Paris and only one has decided to withdraw. This is how far out of step Trump is with the rest of the world. It is the changing of the global guard - as the US bows out, world leaders, CEOs and people across the world can and are moving forward into the future.”


Osprey Orielle Lake, Executive Director, Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN International)
 "In the face of a dangerous and failing Trump administration, and its withdrawal of the US from the Paris Climate Accord, the Women’s Earth and Climate Action Network stands in solidarity with our partners.... Women worldwide are working everyday to protect our lands, waters, climate and children’s futures - and though the challenges and injustices we face are many - women will be undeterred in our action and advocacy for a just and livable world. "
  Farhana Yamin, Founder and CEO, Track 0
 "President Trump’s decision to withdraw from Paris will not bring prosperity to the US. It will create further injustice for those who have contributed little to climate change" .
 


 

And Finally, a voice that speaks out the obvious truth: the fightmust and can go on 

Erika Lennon, Senior Attorney, Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL)
"Donald Trump’s decision to pull the US out of Paris will not save the coal industry or fossil fuels, but instead will slow the urgent action that is needed and undermine the ability of the US to negotiate any international agreement, leaving it isolated and irrelevant.  Mr. Trump may be out, but he doesn’t speak for the world.  The rest of us are still in.  The future demands nothing less.”


Friday, April 14, 2017

Investing in Women: Saving Wildlife the Lankan Way

At a time when governments worldwide are struggling to protect an ever-dwindling wildlife population, in Sri Lanka, a dramatically simple strategy seems to bring good results: pay local women incentives for having their husbands abandon the illegal business.


The roads are wide, the houses are spacious and the yards adorned with flowering bushes. There is a motorbike in each yard and a dish tv antenna on every roof - the first look of  Serakkulia - a fishing village by the ocean in North west Sri Lanka - is truly impressive.


 "This is the richest and most prosperous fishing village I have seen anywhere," I think.

 And then I quickly learn, most of the richness and the prosperity has come through illegal fishing.

I am in Serakkulia on a media tour organized by the United Nations Environment Program (UNEP). The UN agency, along with a few other national and international organizations including the IUCN, is trying to protect a highly endangered sea animal called the Dugong. The biggest threat to the Dugong are fishing nets that catch (and kill) any marine creature. Locally known as "Surukku"  and "Laila" - these nets have been recently (2016), but fishermen with a strong greed for money and little regard for law or environment use them anyway. Serakkulia, I hear, was notorious for that.


But today, this is where the Dugong protectors are trying out a never-before strategy: roping in women of illegal fishers and giving them fund to turn entrepreneurs, so their husbands won't feel compelled to earn a lot of money - by hook or by crook.

Our first visit is to a house that has a signboard outside the main gate -parched on a hedge of dried coconut leaf. It reads, "Reshmi Tailors".  Reshmi, I later learn, is the 5 year old daughter of Mureen Renuka - owner of the house and leader of a team of tailors. Inside the house, in one of the 3 rooms, there are 6 sewing machines. Working with those sewing machines are 8 women. Behind them, hanging on the wall, are a number of pieces they stitched: frocks, tunics, trousers. The machines - each costing about 30,000 Lankan rupee - were given by the Dugong conservation team.

Nilmini, a member of the tailoring collective is busy at work.

There are 400 fishermen in Serakkulia. While everyone is trying stopped using the banned nets, 10 have so far gone public, pledging their support to the conservation team to help save the Dugong. This means not only using the legal fishing methods but also avoiding fishing in areas that are likely to have any endangered species and also informing the authorities if they spot any illegal activities by others.

Typically, in a fisherman community, the man catches the fish while the woman cleans, guts, dry and sometimes help sell in the local market. In Serakkulia most of the catch is loaded in a truck and sold in bigger markets of Puttalam and Colombo, so a woman's job entails mending the nets and other household chores. So, at Reshmi Tailors, women are getting their first shot at turning entrepreneurs and earning some money of their own.

Renuka tells me. "There are 8 of us right now working here full time. We take orders to stitch dresses. But we also train others in tailoring," she says.  
  
At present she earns about  25-28,000 Sri Lankan rupee ($160-$180) from tailoring. Of that, 18,000 is spent on three of her children's school fees alone. Also, as a non-farming community, they buy all their foods - oi, rice, meat, spices, fruits etc- from the market.



Mureen Renuka (left) with her fisherman husband who has given up illegal fishing and Rinjhani -a relative. Both Renuka and Rinjhani now are part of a women's tailoring collective.

 So, what is the cost of adopting sustainable fishing?  Sirimal Santha - Renuka's husband says that his income has been halved. Would he consider returning to illegal fishing again? No way, he says, "the risk is too high - if I get caught, I will lose my nets and also my boat for sure."

But above all, Santha says that his wife would never allow him to turn back on his pledge. "She is working very hard and I don't want to hurt her (by returning to illegal fishing). We are happy," he says. All the other women tailors - Nilmini, Upaka, Ranjani, Tamali - say that their husbands feel the same way.

Later, I meet Niluka Damayanthi and her husband Pradip Prasanna of the same village who are untangling a net in their backyard.

  I ask Damayanthi if she has joined the tailoring cooperative yet. "I joined it 3 months ago and also learnt to stitch. But there is not enough work. So I stopped going there," she says.

Niluka Damayanthi with her husband Pradip Prasanna. Damayanthi - now a trained tailor,  could not find enough work at the tailoring collective

So this seems to be the biggest challenge for this alternative livelihood project: low volume of orders.

Dhamshika Maharana, a local marine conservationist agrees. But he also tells me that the women here are in talks with World Vision for marketing their products to a bigger clientele. Once this deal comes through, they will take orders from the big cities and earn much more, he says.

Finally, I notice that the number of the converted fishermen is too small. But Arjan Rajasurya, local Project Manager at IUCN - tells me that they have just begun to work with the fishermen and for a beginning, the number is quite encouraging. "We wanted to see if incentivizing women would work. Now, we have got an inroad to get into the local community. For us, that's important. We can now replicate this model in other places"

As I get to leave the village, I think that across the world, big and exotic wildlife species are always targeted by illegal hunters and traders. Different countries are adopting different strategies to tackle that: employing former poachers as forest guards, giving more sophisticated weapons to the guards, tagging animals with GPS trackers and many more. 

Upaka - a fisherman's wife, is working full time at the tailoring collective. She hopes that soon they will get more orders from the cities.
Now here in Sri Lanka, to save the endangered marine creatures, they are investing into women - a strategy that is simple and actually working. Could it not work elsewhere?